Skip to content

Religion? Let’s Call a Spade a Spade

Another death in Oregon this week from religious kooks failing to seek medical treatment and instead relying on prayer. This time, a teenager. Unfortunately, it looks as if the parents in this case will not be prosecuted.

Tuesday’s death of 16-year-old Neil Beagley, however, may not be a crime because Oregon law allows minors 14 and older to decide for themselves whether to accept medical treatment.

“All of the interviews from last night are that he did in fact refuse treatment,” police Sgt. Lynne Benton said Wednesday. “Unless we can disprove that, charges probably won’t be filed in this case.”

The problem with this is that the boy was not competent to make such a decision. Most likely, he was inundated with nonsense from the time he was born. Because of his parents’ delusional beliefs, he failed to develop the mental tools necessary for logical and reasoned thought. Courts often declare metnally ill or mentally retarded adults incompetent when it comes time to make decisions regarding their medical care. It’s time now for us to declare teenagers incompetent when they have been subjected to a life of religious indoctrination. Anyone who favors prayer over medical treatment for a disease that is treatable is not competent to decide what to have for dinner.

But let’s not stop there. It’s past time to legally label religious indoctrination what it is: child abuse. How many children have been ruined because they were born into a family who doesn’t believe in reality? How many adults lack critical thinking skills, making them a danger to themselves and to others, because their parents forced upon them a belief that Bronze Age fairy tales are reality? Let’s call a spade a spade, shall we?

This is the year 2008. Most of us are not ignorant, backward peasants with no ability to understand the world around us. We know that lightning isn’t caused by Thor throwing his hammer and that thunderstorms aren’t the result of Zeus being in a bad mood. We know that Ra doesn’t ride across the sky in a boat with the Sun and that the seasons aren’t summoned by Dagda’s magical harp. We have dismissed all of the ancient mythologies as nonsense. So when are we going to give the same treatment to the mythologies that we allow to thrive?

Continued tolerance of stupidity breeds more stupidity. Lousiana is dangerously close to teaching stupidity in science classrooms. State-sactioned stupidity is too horrible to contemplate, but there it is. I know there are secularists out there who are content with letting the religious kooks do their own thing. All they ask is that the religious keep to themselves and not force themselves on everyone else. The problem is that they can’t do that. Proselytizing is a major tenet of many religions. Christians score points with the invisible man if they bring others into the fold. They gain points when they force their ‘values’ on the rest of us. They aren’t about to sit down and shut up.

So let’s just say no to tolerating religious stupidity, ignorance, bigotry, self-righteousness. Let’s say no to tolerating the indoctrination of children. Let’s just say no to violence in the name of god. Don’t tolerate. Educate. Ridicule. Exclude the religious from public functions. Marginalize them. But never tolerate them.

If the world is going to have any kind of positive future, we need to accelerate the demise of religious belief. We can start by dropping the word “religion” from our collective vocabulary and calling it what it is: mythology. After I post this, I’ll be editing the ‘Religion’ category on this blog to reflect that. Let’s set a goal of stamping out the active practice of mythology in modern society by the end of this century. Religious Mythological beliefs deserve no tolerance.

Technorati Tags: , ,

{ 4 } Comments

  1. Chris the blogger | June 23, 2008 at 2:53 pm | Permalink

    I did not write the post you linked to. I copied and pasted it as an example of anti-atheist bigotry. Read the comments thread.

    You are too eager to pass judgment on others.

  2. Aldacron | June 23, 2008 at 4:54 pm | Permalink

    I did not write the post you linked to. I copied and pasted it as an example of anti-atheist bigotry.

    I’ll summarize here what I posted in your comment section. If you are going to copy and paste other people’s posts, at least add something to indicate that’s what you have done. A block quote at the very least. It very much looks like the post in question is written by you. There’s nothing to indicate to someone visiting your blog for the first time that you and the original author are not the same person. The first several commenters obviously believed you to be the author as well.

    And that’s ignoring the copyright issues involved :)

    You are too eager to pass judgment on others.

    No, I’m really not. If someone posts something so insulting and vile that riles me up, I’m certainly going to call them out on it. I don’t roam around the web, looking for people to ‘judge’. This seemed an open and shut case of bigotry. You can’t blame me for getting angry about it when you chose not to clarify that you were not the author of the post until halfway through a long comment thread.

    For those wondering what we’re on about, it’s nothing to do with this post. Rather, it’s about a comment I made on one of Chris the blogger’s posts .

  3. Dr Sam Kault | June 23, 2008 at 9:47 pm | Permalink

    Whatever, you HeAThen!! My flying spagetti monster is gonna drown you with holy bolognaise. RaHoWa

  4. Chris the Blogger | June 23, 2008 at 10:04 pm | Permalink

    That was really the first encounter my blog had with the rest of the internet. Up until http://bligbi.com/ found the ‘No tears for dead atheists’ post I hadn’t had many random passers by. It was obvious to my regular readership that I was not expressing the sentiments contained in the post.

    You had a perfectly natural reaction to Dr Min. It is probably the worst case of anti-atheist bigotry I’ve ever seen. You U.S. atheists (even though you are currently in Korea) seem to pursue these arguments more than my Australian friends. Maybe because here religion isn’t such a big deal. We have a few crazies but even then they are generally comfortable around atheists.

    I had re-posted it from Shelley the Republican who had, in turn, re-posted it from some unsent message group.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *