<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gonzales Made a Boo-Boo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aldacron.net/blog/2007/03/14/gonzales-made-a-boo-boo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aldacron.net/blog/2007/03/14/gonzales-made-a-boo-boo/</link>
	<description>Searching for reason in an unreasonable world.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aldacron</title>
		<link>http://aldacron.net/blog/2007/03/14/gonzales-made-a-boo-boo/comment-page-1/#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>Aldacron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aldacron.net/blog/2007/03/14/gonzales-made-a-boo-boo/#comment-256</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Does it matter to anyone that Bill Clinton personally dismissed 93 US attorneys shortly after taking office, and not a peep was made about it publically or in the press? Itâ€™s the presidentâ€™s prerogative and part of his power to do so.&lt;/i&gt;

No, it doesn't matter. Nor did it matter when Bush did the same when he settled in for his first term. Nor did it matter when other presidents did so when they first took office.

The issues with this particular set of dismissals come from how they were handled -- the attorneys were not given any reason for their dismissal, later, it was said that they were dismissed for performance reasons even though they all had good performance records, Gonzales did not fully disclose to Congress the circumstances surrounding the dismissals...

This is not a partisan issue. People on both sides of the aisle are upset about it, and rightly so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Does it matter to anyone that Bill Clinton personally dismissed 93 US attorneys shortly after taking office, and not a peep was made about it publically or in the press? Itâ€™s the presidentâ€™s prerogative and part of his power to do so.</i></p>
<p>No, it doesn&#8217;t matter. Nor did it matter when Bush did the same when he settled in for his first term. Nor did it matter when other presidents did so when they first took office.</p>
<p>The issues with this particular set of dismissals come from how they were handled &#8212; the attorneys were not given any reason for their dismissal, later, it was said that they were dismissed for performance reasons even though they all had good performance records, Gonzales did not fully disclose to Congress the circumstances surrounding the dismissals&#8230;</p>
<p>This is not a partisan issue. People on both sides of the aisle are upset about it, and rightly so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Q</title>
		<link>http://aldacron.net/blog/2007/03/14/gonzales-made-a-boo-boo/comment-page-1/#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator>John Q</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aldacron.net/blog/2007/03/14/gonzales-made-a-boo-boo/#comment-257</guid>
		<description>Hmm, interesting.  Does it matter to anyone that Bill Clinton personally dismissed 93 US attorneys shortly after taking office, and not a peep was made about it publically or in the press?  It's the president's prerogative and part of his power to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, interesting.  Does it matter to anyone that Bill Clinton personally dismissed 93 US attorneys shortly after taking office, and not a peep was made about it publically or in the press?  It&#8217;s the president&#8217;s prerogative and part of his power to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
