Comments on: James Cameron vs. Christianity http://aldacron.net/blog/2007/02/25/james-cameron-vs-christianity/ Searching for reason in an unreasonable world. Sun, 05 Feb 2012 06:14:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Dale Osborn http://aldacron.net/blog/2007/02/25/james-cameron-vs-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-197 Dale Osborn Thu, 01 Mar 2007 02:35:06 +0000 http://aldacron.net/blog/2007/02/25/james-cameron-vs-christianity/#comment-197 James Cameron's claim is bogus. There was an archeological exihbit in Cleveland at the end of 2006 where there were TWO bone boxes with the name "Jesus" inscribed on them. It's kind of like finding a tombstone with the name "Bill" (or "William") here in the U.S.. If someone claims that the historical Jesus is not the Jesus of the Bible it must mean that the prostitutes of archeology (Cameron, the DaVinci Code, etc.) come out of the woodwork. James Cameron’s claim is bogus. There was an archeological exihbit in Cleveland at the end of 2006 where there were TWO bone boxes with the name “Jesus” inscribed on them. It’s kind of like finding a tombstone with the name “Bill” (or “William”) here in the U.S..

If someone claims that the historical Jesus is not the Jesus of the Bible it must mean that the prostitutes of archeology (Cameron, the DaVinci Code, etc.) come out of the woodwork.

]]> By: Aldacron http://aldacron.net/blog/2007/02/25/james-cameron-vs-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-198 Aldacron Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:27:52 +0000 http://aldacron.net/blog/2007/02/25/james-cameron-vs-christianity/#comment-198 I have yet to see the documentary, so I have no idea whether or not the evidence is convincing. I'm not sure why you would expect me to be objective. As an atheist I'm already quite certain that Christianity is bunk. What I take glee in is the idea that we may actually have evidence to back that up. I do expect the majority of faithful to call it a hoax, regardless. But, hopefully, it will help some people clear their heads of fantasy and realize the truth. I have yet to see the documentary, so I have no idea whether or not the evidence is convincing.

I’m not sure why you would expect me to be objective. As an atheist I’m already quite certain that Christianity is bunk. What I take glee in is the idea that we may actually have evidence to back that up. I do expect the majority of faithful to call it a hoax, regardless. But, hopefully, it will help some people clear their heads of fantasy and realize the truth.

]]> By: James Love http://aldacron.net/blog/2007/02/25/james-cameron-vs-christianity/ Searching for reason in an unreasonable world. Sun, 05 Feb 2012 06:14:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 Comments on: James Cameron vs. Christianity http://aldacron.net/blog/2007/02/25/james-cameron-vs-christianity/ Searching for reason in an unreasonable world. Sun, 05 Feb 2012 06:14:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Dale Osborn http://aldacron.net/blog/2007/02/25/james-cameron-vs-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-197 Dale Osborn Thu, 01 Mar 2007 02:35:06 +0000 http://aldacron.net/blog/2007/02/25/james-cameron-vs-christianity/#comment-197 James Cameron's claim is bogus. There was an archeological exihbit in Cleveland at the end of 2006 where there were TWO bone boxes with the name "Jesus" inscribed on them. It's kind of like finding a tombstone with the name "Bill" (or "William") here in the U.S.. If someone claims that the historical Jesus is not the Jesus of the Bible it must mean that the prostitutes of archeology (Cameron, the DaVinci Code, etc.) come out of the woodwork. James Cameron’s claim is bogus. There was an archeological exihbit in Cleveland at the end of 2006 where there were TWO bone boxes with the name “Jesus” inscribed on them. It’s kind of like finding a tombstone with the name “Bill” (or “William”) here in the U.S..

If someone claims that the historical Jesus is not the Jesus of the Bible it must mean that the prostitutes of archeology (Cameron, the DaVinci Code, etc.) come out of the woodwork.

]]> By: Aldacron http://aldacron.net/blog/2007/02/25/james-cameron-vs-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-198 Aldacron Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:27:52 +0000 http://aldacron.net/blog/2007/02/25/james-cameron-vs-christianity/#comment-198 I have yet to see the documentary, so I have no idea whether or not the evidence is convincing. I'm not sure why you would expect me to be objective. As an atheist I'm already quite certain that Christianity is bunk. What I take glee in is the idea that we may actually have evidence to back that up. I do expect the majority of faithful to call it a hoax, regardless. But, hopefully, it will help some people clear their heads of fantasy and realize the truth. I have yet to see the documentary, so I have no idea whether or not the evidence is convincing.

I’m not sure why you would expect me to be objective. As an atheist I’m already quite certain that Christianity is bunk. What I take glee in is the idea that we may actually have evidence to back that up. I do expect the majority of faithful to call it a hoax, regardless. But, hopefully, it will help some people clear their heads of fantasy and realize the truth.

]]> By: James Love http://aldacron.net/blog/2007/02/25/james-cameron-vs-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-197 Dale Osborn Thu, 01 Mar 2007 02:35:06 +0000 http://aldacron.net/blog/2007/02/25/james-cameron-vs-christianity/#comment-197 James Cameron's claim is bogus. There was an archeological exihbit in Cleveland at the end of 2006 where there were TWO bone boxes with the name "Jesus" inscribed on them. It's kind of like finding a tombstone with the name "Bill" (or "William") here in the U.S.. If someone claims that the historical Jesus is not the Jesus of the Bible it must mean that the prostitutes of archeology (Cameron, the DaVinci Code, etc.) come out of the woodwork. James Cameron’s claim is bogus. There was an archeological exihbit in Cleveland at the end of 2006 where there were TWO bone boxes with the name “Jesus” inscribed on them. It’s kind of like finding a tombstone with the name “Bill” (or “William”) here in the U.S..

If someone claims that the historical Jesus is not the Jesus of the Bible it must mean that the prostitutes of archeology (Cameron, the DaVinci Code, etc.) come out of the woodwork.

]]> Comments on: James Cameron vs. Christianity http://aldacron.net/blog/2007/02/25/james-cameron-vs-christianity/ Searching for reason in an unreasonable world. Sun, 05 Feb 2012 06:14:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Dale Osborn http://aldacron.net/blog/2007/02/25/james-cameron-vs-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-197 Dale Osborn Thu, 01 Mar 2007 02:35:06 +0000 http://aldacron.net/blog/2007/02/25/james-cameron-vs-christianity/#comment-197 James Cameron's claim is bogus. There was an archeological exihbit in Cleveland at the end of 2006 where there were TWO bone boxes with the name "Jesus" inscribed on them. It's kind of like finding a tombstone with the name "Bill" (or "William") here in the U.S.. If someone claims that the historical Jesus is not the Jesus of the Bible it must mean that the prostitutes of archeology (Cameron, the DaVinci Code, etc.) come out of the woodwork. James Cameron’s claim is bogus. There was an archeological exihbit in Cleveland at the end of 2006 where there were TWO bone boxes with the name “Jesus” inscribed on them. It’s kind of like finding a tombstone with the name “Bill” (or “William”) here in the U.S..

If someone claims that the historical Jesus is not the Jesus of the Bible it must mean that the prostitutes of archeology (Cameron, the DaVinci Code, etc.) come out of the woodwork.

]]> By: Aldacron http://aldacron.net/blog/2007/02/25/james-cameron-vs-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-198 Aldacron Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:27:52 +0000 http://aldacron.net/blog/2007/02/25/james-cameron-vs-christianity/#comment-198 I have yet to see the documentary, so I have no idea whether or not the evidence is convincing. I'm not sure why you would expect me to be objective. As an atheist I'm already quite certain that Christianity is bunk. What I take glee in is the idea that we may actually have evidence to back that up. I do expect the majority of faithful to call it a hoax, regardless. But, hopefully, it will help some people clear their heads of fantasy and realize the truth. I have yet to see the documentary, so I have no idea whether or not the evidence is convincing.

I’m not sure why you would expect me to be objective. As an atheist I’m already quite certain that Christianity is bunk. What I take glee in is the idea that we may actually have evidence to back that up. I do expect the majority of faithful to call it a hoax, regardless. But, hopefully, it will help some people clear their heads of fantasy and realize the truth.

]]> By: James Love http://aldacron.net/blog/2007/02/25/james-cameron-vs-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-198 Aldacron Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:27:52 +0000 http://aldacron.net/blog/2007/02/25/james-cameron-vs-christianity/#comment-198 I have yet to see the documentary, so I have no idea whether or not the evidence is convincing. I'm not sure why you would expect me to be objective. As an atheist I'm already quite certain that Christianity is bunk. What I take glee in is the idea that we may actually have evidence to back that up. I do expect the majority of faithful to call it a hoax, regardless. But, hopefully, it will help some people clear their heads of fantasy and realize the truth. I have yet to see the documentary, so I have no idea whether or not the evidence is convincing.

I’m not sure why you would expect me to be objective. As an atheist I’m already quite certain that Christianity is bunk. What I take glee in is the idea that we may actually have evidence to back that up. I do expect the majority of faithful to call it a hoax, regardless. But, hopefully, it will help some people clear their heads of fantasy and realize the truth.

]]> Comments on: James Cameron vs. Christianity http://aldacron.net/blog/2007/02/25/james-cameron-vs-christianity/ Searching for reason in an unreasonable world. Sun, 05 Feb 2012 06:14:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Dale Osborn http://aldacron.net/blog/2007/02/25/james-cameron-vs-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-197 Dale Osborn Thu, 01 Mar 2007 02:35:06 +0000 http://aldacron.net/blog/2007/02/25/james-cameron-vs-christianity/#comment-197 James Cameron's claim is bogus. There was an archeological exihbit in Cleveland at the end of 2006 where there were TWO bone boxes with the name "Jesus" inscribed on them. It's kind of like finding a tombstone with the name "Bill" (or "William") here in the U.S.. If someone claims that the historical Jesus is not the Jesus of the Bible it must mean that the prostitutes of archeology (Cameron, the DaVinci Code, etc.) come out of the woodwork. James Cameron’s claim is bogus. There was an archeological exihbit in Cleveland at the end of 2006 where there were TWO bone boxes with the name “Jesus” inscribed on them. It’s kind of like finding a tombstone with the name “Bill” (or “William”) here in the U.S..

If someone claims that the historical Jesus is not the Jesus of the Bible it must mean that the prostitutes of archeology (Cameron, the DaVinci Code, etc.) come out of the woodwork.

]]> By: Aldacron http://aldacron.net/blog/2007/02/25/james-cameron-vs-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-198 Aldacron Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:27:52 +0000 http://aldacron.net/blog/2007/02/25/james-cameron-vs-christianity/#comment-198 I have yet to see the documentary, so I have no idea whether or not the evidence is convincing. I'm not sure why you would expect me to be objective. As an atheist I'm already quite certain that Christianity is bunk. What I take glee in is the idea that we may actually have evidence to back that up. I do expect the majority of faithful to call it a hoax, regardless. But, hopefully, it will help some people clear their heads of fantasy and realize the truth. I have yet to see the documentary, so I have no idea whether or not the evidence is convincing.

I’m not sure why you would expect me to be objective. As an atheist I’m already quite certain that Christianity is bunk. What I take glee in is the idea that we may actually have evidence to back that up. I do expect the majority of faithful to call it a hoax, regardless. But, hopefully, it will help some people clear their heads of fantasy and realize the truth.

]]> By: James Love http://aldacron.net/blog/2007/02/25/james-cameron-vs-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-199 James Love Mon, 26 Feb 2007 03:00:45 +0000 http://aldacron.net/blog/2007/02/25/james-cameron-vs-christianity/#comment-199 Sure my faith might be a fiction, however given the box of James hoax, I question you objectivity on this issue. You seem to take glee in the idea that Christianity might be bunk. Sure, that might be the case, but more likely this is a hoax, and even if the boxes are authentic, there still is no body of Jesus and the DNA inconsistencies could reasonably be due to multiple users of the boxes which was customary at the time. Perhaps the DNA was from a former "occupant"? Sure my faith might be a fiction, however given the box of James hoax, I question you objectivity on this issue. You seem to take glee in the idea that Christianity might be bunk. Sure, that might be the case, but more likely this is a hoax, and even if the boxes are authentic, there still is no body of Jesus and the DNA inconsistencies could reasonably be due to multiple users of the boxes which was customary at the time. Perhaps the DNA was from a former “occupant”?

]]>